<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Photo-facts.com | the digital photography a-z</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photo-facts.com/WP/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photo-facts.com/WP</link>
	<description>Camera technology, jargon and techniques explained • Use the A-Z index or the search box to look up your chosen term</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 11:52:35 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Camera clubs in Hertfordshire by ICON</title>
		<link>http://www.photo-facts.com/WP/archives/7710/comment-page-1#comment-688</link>
		<dc:creator>ICON</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 11:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photo-facts.com/WP/?p=7710#comment-688</guid>
		<description>ICON is based in Bishop&#039;s Stortford, Hertfordshire. 
Could this club be added to your &quot;Camera Clubs in Hertfordshire&quot; list, please?
Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ICON is based in Bishop&#8217;s Stortford, Hertfordshire.<br />
Could this club be added to your &#8220;Camera Clubs in Hertfordshire&#8221; list, please?<br />
Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on BIONZ (Sony) and image processing by michel</title>
		<link>http://www.photo-facts.com/WP/archives/7840/comment-page-1#comment-666</link>
		<dc:creator>michel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 12:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photo-facts.com/WP/?p=7840#comment-666</guid>
		<description>merci beaucoup pour l&#039;information! michel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>merci beaucoup pour l&#8217;information! michel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on BIONZ (Sony) and image processing by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.photo-facts.com/WP/archives/7840/comment-page-1#comment-662</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 21:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photo-facts.com/WP/?p=7840#comment-662</guid>
		<description>Are you asking which processor is the best between BIONZ, EXPEED, DIGIC and the rest? It&#039;s very hard to say because the overall performance of the system also depends on the quality and design of the sensor, the size and speed of the camera&#039;s buffer and the individual processor. Canon&#039;s DIGIC system refers to the processor design rather than a single unit, so the DIGIC processor in a PowerShot compact will be very different to that in a 1Ds Mk III.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you asking which processor is the best between BIONZ, EXPEED, DIGIC and the rest? It&#8217;s very hard to say because the overall performance of the system also depends on the quality and design of the sensor, the size and speed of the camera&#8217;s buffer and the individual processor. Canon&#8217;s DIGIC system refers to the processor design rather than a single unit, so the DIGIC processor in a PowerShot compact will be very different to that in a 1Ds Mk III.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on BIONZ (Sony) and image processing by michel</title>
		<link>http://www.photo-facts.com/WP/archives/7840/comment-page-1#comment-661</link>
		<dc:creator>michel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photo-facts.com/WP/?p=7840#comment-661</guid>
		<description>mais quel est-il leprocesseur le plus bon le plusefficient?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mais quel est-il leprocesseur le plus bon le plusefficient?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Battery life by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.photo-facts.com/WP/archives/2571/comment-page-1#comment-390</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 11:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photo-facts.com/WP/archives/2571#comment-390</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comment, Colin. Camera manufacturers sometimes quote a brief overview of the test conditions in their camera documentation, but I have tracked down the following PDF which appears to be the official specification for the CIPA standard. It&#039;s a bit wordy, as they usually are, but you might find it useful:

http://www.cipa.jp/english/hyoujunka/kikaku/pdf/DC-002_e.pdf

You might find more general information elsewhere on the CIPA site:

http://www.cipa.jp/english</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment, Colin. Camera manufacturers sometimes quote a brief overview of the test conditions in their camera documentation, but I have tracked down the following PDF which appears to be the official specification for the CIPA standard. It&#8217;s a bit wordy, as they usually are, but you might find it useful:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cipa.jp/english/hyoujunka/kikaku/pdf/DC-002_e.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.cipa.jp/english/hyoujunka/kikaku/pdf/DC-002_e.pdf</a></p>
<p>You might find more general information elsewhere on the CIPA site:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cipa.jp/english" rel="nofollow">http://www.cipa.jp/english</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Battery life by Colin Burt</title>
		<link>http://www.photo-facts.com/WP/archives/2571/comment-page-1#comment-386</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Burt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 01:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photo-facts.com/WP/archives/2571#comment-386</guid>
		<description>The CIPA standard battery testing is mentioned a couple of times on this site.  But there are no details of the parameters of the test so it is not possible to apply it to a suspect battery.  Were the details available a user could reproduce the test and make an informed decision about a particular battery, when new, after period of use, and towards end of life.  A useful test if one knew how to do it ! Please consider,  and if you agree please let me know when you are about to add it to the excellent site</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The CIPA standard battery testing is mentioned a couple of times on this site.  But there are no details of the parameters of the test so it is not possible to apply it to a suspect battery.  Were the details available a user could reproduce the test and make an informed decision about a particular battery, when new, after period of use, and towards end of life.  A useful test if one knew how to do it ! Please consider,  and if you agree please let me know when you are about to add it to the excellent site</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bluetooth by Eines</title>
		<link>http://www.photo-facts.com/WP/archives/4493/comment-page-1#comment-342</link>
		<dc:creator>Eines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 11:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photo-facts.com/WP/?p=4493#comment-342</guid>
		<description>I think the Bluetooth feature would be a good one when transferring pictures to my cell phone, mp3 player and printer that support Bluetooth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the Bluetooth feature would be a good one when transferring pictures to my cell phone, mp3 player and printer that support Bluetooth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pentax K-7 by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.photo-facts.com/WP/archives/6226/comment-page-1#comment-338</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 08:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photo-facts.com/WP/?p=6226#comment-338</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Sergio. Yes, the minimum ISO in the expanded dynamic range mode is increased to ISO 200, but I didn&#039;t want to get bogged down in too much detail in the explanation,

My wording must have been ambiguous for the lens correction explanation. I meant the K-7 could correct any lens distortion in the lens being used, not distortion with any lens. Further down, I do point out that this feature is confined to DA, DA L and D FA lenses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Sergio. Yes, the minimum ISO in the expanded dynamic range mode is increased to ISO 200, but I didn&#8217;t want to get bogged down in too much detail in the explanation,</p>
<p>My wording must have been ambiguous for the lens correction explanation. I meant the K-7 could correct any lens distortion in the lens being used, not distortion with any lens. Further down, I do point out that this feature is confined to DA, DA L and D FA lenses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pentax K-7 by Sergio</title>
		<link>http://www.photo-facts.com/WP/archives/6226/comment-page-1#comment-337</link>
		<dc:creator>Sergio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 00:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photo-facts.com/WP/?p=6226#comment-337</guid>
		<description>You did not mention when the highlight extended dynamic range is activated, your minimum ISO is now 200.

&quot;The body can correct any lens distortion ...&quot;

According to the manual, only DA, DA L and D FA lenses will will get distortion correction.  Not  all of the lenses you can put on a K-7 will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You did not mention when the highlight extended dynamic range is activated, your minimum ISO is now 200.</p>
<p>&#8220;The body can correct any lens distortion &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>According to the manual, only DA, DA L and D FA lenses will will get distortion correction.  Not  all of the lenses you can put on a K-7 will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Adobe Gamma by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.photo-facts.com/WP/archives/4673/comment-page-1#comment-183</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 06:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photo-facts.com/WP/?p=4673#comment-183</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Martin, you&#039;re right. Adobe seem to have dropped it from CS3 and Elements 5 onwards as people switched from CRTs, which it seems to have been designed for, to LCDs. There are alternatives, such as Quick Gamma 3 (http://quickgamma.de/version3en.html), but the best route now for PC users is probably a proper hardware calibrator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Martin, you&#8217;re right. Adobe seem to have dropped it from CS3 and Elements 5 onwards as people switched from CRTs, which it seems to have been designed for, to LCDs. There are alternatives, such as Quick Gamma 3 (<a href="http://quickgamma.de/version3en.html)" rel="nofollow">http://quickgamma.de/version3en.html)</a>, but the best route now for PC users is probably a proper hardware calibrator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
